Ayudante De Santa
06-11-2015, 22:19:08
Ver la Versión Completa Con Imagenes : Bilingual article: Emir Sader: Rescate de la política en contra del poder del dinero
PEDROELGRANDE
03-09-2015, 16:55:58
31/08/2015
Opinión
http://imagezilla.net/thumbs2/8BoPFB7-SS1_tn.jpg (http://imagezilla.net/show/8BoPFB7-SS1.jpg)
Financierizacion significa que el dinero lo invade todo. Que el capital especulativo es el hegemónico. Los bancos ya no prestan para inversiones productivas o para que la gente compre lo que necesita o para se hagan investigaciones. No, los bancos viven de la compra y venta de papeles. Cuando se anuncian, con todos sus ceros, al final de cada día, cuanto ha movido cada bolsa de valores, no se ha producido ni un bien, ni se ha generado ni un empleo.
El capital financiero nació para apoyar a la agricultura, adelantar capital para recibir después de la cosecha. Hoy ese capital fue promovido a sector hegemónico de las economías, un fin en sí mismo.
Cuando se agotó el ciclo anterior del capitalismo, el diagnóstico triunfante decía que la economía había dejado de crecer porque había demasiadas trabas, demasiadas regulaciones. Había que terminar con ellas y, según Ronald Reagan, la economía volvería a crecer y todos ganarían de nuevo.
Las regulaciones fueron canceladas - programa central del neoliberalismo – pero no se retomó el crecimiento. Porque, como decía Marx, el capital no está hecho para producir, sino para acumular. Sin trabas, el capital se transfirió, en cantidades gigantescas, al sector financiero, que es donde gana más, paga menos impuestos y tiene liquidez total. No es que existan capitalistas productivos y especulativos. Todo gran grupo económico tiene un banco o un centro de inversiones, de donde gana más que en sus actividades originales.
Liberado de trabas, el capital se concentró en su forma financiera, como capital especulativo, el que solo vende y compra papeles, el que vive del endeudamiento – de países, de empresas, de personas. El que se alimenta de las deudas y alimenta las deudas.
Cuando empezó la crisis actual en el centro del capitalismo, Obama dijo que había que salvar a los bancos, sino sus techos caerían en las cabezas de todos. Se han salvado los bancos, que están muy bien, a dios gracias, los que quebraron enseguida fueron los países.
En un mundo así dominado por el dinero, no cabe la política, como espacio de decisión de las personas sobre el destino de la sociedad. Pueden pronunciarse pero, si se pronuncian por otra lógica que no sean la de los bancos, viven su frustración, porque las redes de poder no dejan espacio para otra lógica que no sea la de la especulación financiera.
Hacer política es así estar a contramano de la lógica capitalista contemporánea, la lógica neoliberal, que busca imponer los intereses del capital financiero. El que entre en esa lógica, es devorado por ella. Hacer política es construir alternativas que privilegien las políticas sociales y no los ajustes fiscales, los procesos de integración regional y no los Tratados de Libre Comercio, que recuperen la capacidad de acción y de hacer política de los Estados y de los gobiernos.
Actuar en esa dirección es estar condenado por los organismos financieros internacionales, por la grandes medios de comunicación, por los partidos tradicionales. Pero es la única forma de rescatar el derecho de la gente de escoger su destino, en contra del destino definido por el dinero y los bancos.
- Emir Sader, sociólogo y científico político brasileño, es coordinador del Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas de la Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http: w w w . alainet. org/es/articulo/172069
Opinión
http://imagezilla.net/thumbs2/8BoPFB7-SS1_tn.jpg (http://imagezilla.net/show/8BoPFB7-SS1.jpg)
Financierizacion significa que el dinero lo invade todo. Que el capital especulativo es el hegemónico. Los bancos ya no prestan para inversiones productivas o para que la gente compre lo que necesita o para se hagan investigaciones. No, los bancos viven de la compra y venta de papeles. Cuando se anuncian, con todos sus ceros, al final de cada día, cuanto ha movido cada bolsa de valores, no se ha producido ni un bien, ni se ha generado ni un empleo.
El capital financiero nació para apoyar a la agricultura, adelantar capital para recibir después de la cosecha. Hoy ese capital fue promovido a sector hegemónico de las economías, un fin en sí mismo.
Cuando se agotó el ciclo anterior del capitalismo, el diagnóstico triunfante decía que la economía había dejado de crecer porque había demasiadas trabas, demasiadas regulaciones. Había que terminar con ellas y, según Ronald Reagan, la economía volvería a crecer y todos ganarían de nuevo.
Las regulaciones fueron canceladas - programa central del neoliberalismo – pero no se retomó el crecimiento. Porque, como decía Marx, el capital no está hecho para producir, sino para acumular. Sin trabas, el capital se transfirió, en cantidades gigantescas, al sector financiero, que es donde gana más, paga menos impuestos y tiene liquidez total. No es que existan capitalistas productivos y especulativos. Todo gran grupo económico tiene un banco o un centro de inversiones, de donde gana más que en sus actividades originales.
Liberado de trabas, el capital se concentró en su forma financiera, como capital especulativo, el que solo vende y compra papeles, el que vive del endeudamiento – de países, de empresas, de personas. El que se alimenta de las deudas y alimenta las deudas.
Cuando empezó la crisis actual en el centro del capitalismo, Obama dijo que había que salvar a los bancos, sino sus techos caerían en las cabezas de todos. Se han salvado los bancos, que están muy bien, a dios gracias, los que quebraron enseguida fueron los países.
En un mundo así dominado por el dinero, no cabe la política, como espacio de decisión de las personas sobre el destino de la sociedad. Pueden pronunciarse pero, si se pronuncian por otra lógica que no sean la de los bancos, viven su frustración, porque las redes de poder no dejan espacio para otra lógica que no sea la de la especulación financiera.
Hacer política es así estar a contramano de la lógica capitalista contemporánea, la lógica neoliberal, que busca imponer los intereses del capital financiero. El que entre en esa lógica, es devorado por ella. Hacer política es construir alternativas que privilegien las políticas sociales y no los ajustes fiscales, los procesos de integración regional y no los Tratados de Libre Comercio, que recuperen la capacidad de acción y de hacer política de los Estados y de los gobiernos.
Actuar en esa dirección es estar condenado por los organismos financieros internacionales, por la grandes medios de comunicación, por los partidos tradicionales. Pero es la única forma de rescatar el derecho de la gente de escoger su destino, en contra del destino definido por el dinero y los bancos.
- Emir Sader, sociólogo y científico político brasileño, es coordinador del Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas de la Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http: w w w . alainet. org/es/articulo/172069
Ayudante De Santa
06-11-2015, 22:19:08
Miguelito87
03-09-2015, 17:27:11
Lastima que ni tu ni tu dictador tropical sean bilingues:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi1UIaigtJs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAfzjzgLGsY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi1UIaigtJs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAfzjzgLGsY
PEDROELGRANDE
03-09-2015, 17:31:06
Ese Miguelín es mucho tarugo ahí se los edito pa que no diga que soy egoísta como vos :roll:Vi1UIaigtJs
XAfzjzgLGsY
XAfzjzgLGsY
Miguelito87
03-09-2015, 17:32:47
Ese Miguelín es mucho tarugo ahí se los edito pa que no diga que soy egoísta como vos :roll:Vi1UIaigtJs
XAfzjzgLGsY
Los de tu clase deben inclinarse ante la mía, es ley universal :)
XAfzjzgLGsY
Los de tu clase deben inclinarse ante la mía, es ley universal :)
PEDROELGRANDE
03-09-2015, 17:37:35
And now the english article...dedicated to little Michael 87 :laughing9:
Rescue politics from the power of money
Emir Sader
Versión para impresión
02/09/2015
Opinión
http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/43366/e7a127433659419.jpg (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e7a127433659419)
Financialisation means that money invades everywhere. That speculative capital is hegemonic. The banks no longer lend for productive investments or for people to buy what they need or to do research. No, the banks thrive on the buying and selling of papers. When they announce, with all their zeros, at the end of each day, how much each stock market has moved, no goods have been produced, nor has a job been generated.
Finance capital was born to support agriculture, to advance capital to be redeemed after the harvest. Today this capital has become a hegemonic sector in the economies, an end in itself.
When the former cycle of capitalism ended, the triumphalist diagnosis said that the economy had ceased to grow because there were too many obstacles, too many regulations. We had to do away with them so that, according to Ronald Reagan, the economy would begin to grow and everyone would profit again.
The regulations were cancelled -- the central programme of neoliberalism -- but there was no return to growth. Because, as Marx said, capital is not made to produce but to accumulate. Without limits, capital was transferred, in gigantic quantities, to the financial sector, which is where it gains the most, pays the least taxes and has total liquidity. There is no division between productive and speculative capitalists. Every large economic group has a bank or a centre of investment, from which they gain more than in their original activities.
Freed from limits, capital was concentrated in its financial expression, as speculative capital, which only sells and buys papers, and lives on indebtedness -- of countries, businesses, and persons. One that feeds on debts, and feeds debts.
When the present crisis began in the centre of capitalism, Obama said that we had to save the banks, otherwise their roofs would cave in on all of our heads. The banks were saved, they are doing well, God be thanked; those that finally went broke were the countries.
In a world thus dominated by money, there is no room for politics, as a space for people’s decision-making on the destiny of society. They can speak up, but if they speak for a different logic to that of the banks, they live in frustration because the networks of power leave no space for another logic that is not that of financial speculation.
Policy-making is thus countercurrent to contemporary capitalist logic, neoliberal logic, that seeks to impose the interests of financial capital. Whoever moves into this logic is devoured by it. Politics in practice is building alternatives that privilege social policies, rather than fiscal adjustments; that promote processes of regional integration and not free trade agreements; that recover the ability of States and governments to act and to make policy.
To act in this direction means to be condemned by international financial organisms, the big media and traditional parties. But it is the only way to rescue the right of people to choose their own destiny, as against the destiny defined by money and the banks.
31/08/2015
(by Jordan Bishop)
- Emir Sader, Brazilian Sociologist and Political Scientist, is the Coordinator of the Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas, Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http : / / w w w . alainet . org/es/node/172109
Rescue politics from the power of money
Emir Sader
Versión para impresión
02/09/2015
Opinión
http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/43366/e7a127433659419.jpg (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e7a127433659419)
Financialisation means that money invades everywhere. That speculative capital is hegemonic. The banks no longer lend for productive investments or for people to buy what they need or to do research. No, the banks thrive on the buying and selling of papers. When they announce, with all their zeros, at the end of each day, how much each stock market has moved, no goods have been produced, nor has a job been generated.
Finance capital was born to support agriculture, to advance capital to be redeemed after the harvest. Today this capital has become a hegemonic sector in the economies, an end in itself.
When the former cycle of capitalism ended, the triumphalist diagnosis said that the economy had ceased to grow because there were too many obstacles, too many regulations. We had to do away with them so that, according to Ronald Reagan, the economy would begin to grow and everyone would profit again.
The regulations were cancelled -- the central programme of neoliberalism -- but there was no return to growth. Because, as Marx said, capital is not made to produce but to accumulate. Without limits, capital was transferred, in gigantic quantities, to the financial sector, which is where it gains the most, pays the least taxes and has total liquidity. There is no division between productive and speculative capitalists. Every large economic group has a bank or a centre of investment, from which they gain more than in their original activities.
Freed from limits, capital was concentrated in its financial expression, as speculative capital, which only sells and buys papers, and lives on indebtedness -- of countries, businesses, and persons. One that feeds on debts, and feeds debts.
When the present crisis began in the centre of capitalism, Obama said that we had to save the banks, otherwise their roofs would cave in on all of our heads. The banks were saved, they are doing well, God be thanked; those that finally went broke were the countries.
In a world thus dominated by money, there is no room for politics, as a space for people’s decision-making on the destiny of society. They can speak up, but if they speak for a different logic to that of the banks, they live in frustration because the networks of power leave no space for another logic that is not that of financial speculation.
Policy-making is thus countercurrent to contemporary capitalist logic, neoliberal logic, that seeks to impose the interests of financial capital. Whoever moves into this logic is devoured by it. Politics in practice is building alternatives that privilege social policies, rather than fiscal adjustments; that promote processes of regional integration and not free trade agreements; that recover the ability of States and governments to act and to make policy.
To act in this direction means to be condemned by international financial organisms, the big media and traditional parties. But it is the only way to rescue the right of people to choose their own destiny, as against the destiny defined by money and the banks.
31/08/2015
(by Jordan Bishop)
- Emir Sader, Brazilian Sociologist and Political Scientist, is the Coordinator of the Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas, Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http : / / w w w . alainet . org/es/node/172109
Miguelito87
03-09-2015, 17:39:34
And now the english article...dedicated to little Michael 87 :laughing9:
Rescue politics from the power of money
Emir Sader
Versión para impresión
02/09/2015
Opinión
http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/43366/e7a127433659419.jpg (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e7a127433659419)
Financialisation means that money invades everywhere. That speculative capital is hegemonic. The banks no longer lend for productive investments or for people to buy what they need or to do research. No, the banks thrive on the buying and selling of papers. When they announce, with all their zeros, at the end of each day, how much each stock market has moved, no goods have been produced, nor has a job been generated.
Finance capital was born to support agriculture, to advance capital to be redeemed after the harvest. Today this capital has become a hegemonic sector in the economies, an end in itself.
When the former cycle of capitalism ended, the triumphalist diagnosis said that the economy had ceased to grow because there were too many obstacles, too many regulations. We had to do away with them so that, according to Ronald Reagan, the economy would begin to grow and everyone would profit again.
The regulations were cancelled -- the central programme of neoliberalism -- but there was no return to growth. Because, as Marx said, capital is not made to produce but to accumulate. Without limits, capital was transferred, in gigantic quantities, to the financial sector, which is where it gains the most, pays the least taxes and has total liquidity. There is no division between productive and speculative capitalists. Every large economic group has a bank or a centre of investment, from which they gain more than in their original activities.
Freed from limits, capital was concentrated in its financial expression, as speculative capital, which only sells and buys papers, and lives on indebtedness -- of countries, businesses, and persons. One that feeds on debts, and feeds debts.
When the present crisis began in the centre of capitalism, Obama said that we had to save the banks, otherwise their roofs would cave in on all of our heads. The banks were saved, they are doing well, God be thanked; those that finally went broke were the countries.
In a world thus dominated by money, there is no room for politics, as a space for people’s decision-making on the destiny of society. They can speak up, but if they speak for a different logic to that of the banks, they live in frustration because the networks of power leave no space for another logic that is not that of financial speculation.
Policy-making is thus countercurrent to contemporary capitalist logic, neoliberal logic, that seeks to impose the interests of financial capital. Whoever moves into this logic is devoured by it. Politics in practice is building alternatives that privilege social policies, rather than fiscal adjustments; that promote processes of regional integration and not free trade agreements; that recover the ability of States and governments to act and to make policy.
To act in this direction means to be condemned by international financial organisms, the big media and traditional parties. But it is the only way to rescue the right of people to choose their own destiny, as against the destiny defined by money and the banks.
31/08/2015
(by Jordan Bishop)
- Emir Sader, Brazilian Sociologist and Political Scientist, is the Coordinator of the Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas, Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http : / / w w w . alainet . org/es/node/172109
Respondere con el ejemplo que no has dado:
http://www.denunciando.com/attachments/politica-y-sociedad/2447108d1441319854-topic-oficial-de-humor-politico-11933448_867475259997565_2054923058043423387_n.jpg
Rescue politics from the power of money
Emir Sader
Versión para impresión
02/09/2015
Opinión
http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/43366/e7a127433659419.jpg (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e7a127433659419)
Financialisation means that money invades everywhere. That speculative capital is hegemonic. The banks no longer lend for productive investments or for people to buy what they need or to do research. No, the banks thrive on the buying and selling of papers. When they announce, with all their zeros, at the end of each day, how much each stock market has moved, no goods have been produced, nor has a job been generated.
Finance capital was born to support agriculture, to advance capital to be redeemed after the harvest. Today this capital has become a hegemonic sector in the economies, an end in itself.
When the former cycle of capitalism ended, the triumphalist diagnosis said that the economy had ceased to grow because there were too many obstacles, too many regulations. We had to do away with them so that, according to Ronald Reagan, the economy would begin to grow and everyone would profit again.
The regulations were cancelled -- the central programme of neoliberalism -- but there was no return to growth. Because, as Marx said, capital is not made to produce but to accumulate. Without limits, capital was transferred, in gigantic quantities, to the financial sector, which is where it gains the most, pays the least taxes and has total liquidity. There is no division between productive and speculative capitalists. Every large economic group has a bank or a centre of investment, from which they gain more than in their original activities.
Freed from limits, capital was concentrated in its financial expression, as speculative capital, which only sells and buys papers, and lives on indebtedness -- of countries, businesses, and persons. One that feeds on debts, and feeds debts.
When the present crisis began in the centre of capitalism, Obama said that we had to save the banks, otherwise their roofs would cave in on all of our heads. The banks were saved, they are doing well, God be thanked; those that finally went broke were the countries.
In a world thus dominated by money, there is no room for politics, as a space for people’s decision-making on the destiny of society. They can speak up, but if they speak for a different logic to that of the banks, they live in frustration because the networks of power leave no space for another logic that is not that of financial speculation.
Policy-making is thus countercurrent to contemporary capitalist logic, neoliberal logic, that seeks to impose the interests of financial capital. Whoever moves into this logic is devoured by it. Politics in practice is building alternatives that privilege social policies, rather than fiscal adjustments; that promote processes of regional integration and not free trade agreements; that recover the ability of States and governments to act and to make policy.
To act in this direction means to be condemned by international financial organisms, the big media and traditional parties. But it is the only way to rescue the right of people to choose their own destiny, as against the destiny defined by money and the banks.
31/08/2015
(by Jordan Bishop)
- Emir Sader, Brazilian Sociologist and Political Scientist, is the Coordinator of the Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas, Universidad Estadual de Rio de Janeiro (Uerj).
http : / / w w w . alainet . org/es/node/172109
Respondere con el ejemplo que no has dado:
http://www.denunciando.com/attachments/politica-y-sociedad/2447108d1441319854-topic-oficial-de-humor-politico-11933448_867475259997565_2054923058043423387_n.jpg
Tyler Durden
03-09-2015, 18:31:30
La bitch de Maburro defendiéndolo como gatas patas arriba... no nos vaya a arañar :laughing9:
PEDROELGRANDE
03-09-2015, 19:25:31
La bitch de Maburro defendiéndolo como gatas patas arriba... no nos vaya a arañar :laughing9:
Uhmmm you so bitch de Uribe.... en retribución delante del Foro...chico Bulling... u matoneador foral que llaman :laughing9:
Uhmmm you so bitch de Uribe.... en retribución delante del Foro...chico Bulling... u matoneador foral que llaman :laughing9:
Tyler Durden
04-09-2015, 08:59:29
Uhmmm you so bitch de Uribe.... en retribución delante del Foro...chico Bulling... u matoneador foral que llaman :laughing9:
La perra metiendo a Uribe como siempre, esa traga la tiene enferma. :laughing9:
Debemos curarlo:
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150414210130/creepypasta/es/images/6/60/CdLGuillotina.jpg
La perra metiendo a Uribe como siempre, esa traga la tiene enferma. :laughing9:
Debemos curarlo:
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150414210130/creepypasta/es/images/6/60/CdLGuillotina.jpg
EL*BARTO
04-09-2015, 09:14:49
JWIb7_7s_3c
EhxIc_OLUp0
EhxIc_OLUp0
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Derechos de autor ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO
SEO by vBSEO